Bridge inspection: scour cosmetic but collision of concern

Bathwick Hill canal bridge

A council engineer has checked the Bathwick Hill canal bridge at Cllr Coombes’ request, following the concerns of local residents.

The crumbling stonework on the parapet was raised by the local residents’ association, but the structural engineer says this is (so far) only a cosmetic concern. Dust and grit swept by passing traffic scours the parapet causing erosion of the stone, leaving a flaking appearance. Structurally this is not of concern as there is plenty of stone left; historically the Grade II bridge is diminished by the pollution.

On inspecting the bridge, the engineer noticed unreported damage to the North-East (uphill, upstream) end of the parapet wall. This was probably caused by a collision knocking the ashlar blocks out of place. This and other minor issues are of concern and the engineer has made recommendations for repair.

The bridge is the responsibility of British Waterways, who own and manage the canals. They have been informed of the council’s concerns and your Liberal Democrat councillors will be following the matter up.

Railway railings

Railway in Sydney Gardens 

Network Rail are seeking to fenmce the high speed line through Sydney Gardens.

Netwrok Rail, who own the line, have been instructed by the Rail Regulator that the railway line must be made safe against trespass and vandalism. At a consultation in February, 90% of people agreed that something should be done to improve safety.

The revised plan is for a tall iron railing, one metre back from the low stone wall. The little-used track-side path to the North would be closed entirely. Network Rail also suggests a gate in the fence, so that they can organise track-side steam train viewing.

The plans will still need permission from the council, who own the park, and from the planning committee as the gardens are protected.

Committee controversy

In light of this week’s Chronicle I thought I’d better write a little about Development Control Committee, or ‘planning’.

Normally I try to keep this blog to mostly interesting local news items, with occasional mention mentions of council meetings – the Regulatory (Access) Committee is as fun as it sounds. To test this , I have set up a running poll to the left hand side of this page, just below the links. Kindly vote for ‘more’ or fewer’ committee stories, so that I don’t waste anyone’s time with long meeting minutes in the future.

However, last month’s planning meeting has spilt considerably into the news realm, with accusations of coersion, dishonesty and impropriety over the park and ride applications.

I voted to support two park and ride proposals, at Lansdown and Odd Down (although I am quite proud to have voted against this at a previous meeting). However, I could not support the third – an application to concrete over the river-side meadow at Bathampton for a 1,400 space car park (yes, I do know the Joni Mitchell song; by apparent co-incidence I returned home after the seven hour planning meeting to hear Big Yellow Taxi on the sterio). Given the level of congestion on the London Road and suppressed demand, the traffic report showed that the scheme would allow 1,400 extra car drivers into the city centre, without any reduction in congestion or pollution. This I assessed as particularly small gain, far outweighed by the huge inherent cost of paving an alluvial meadow in such an idyllic spot.

However, others did not agree with me, indeed two Liberal Democrats voted for the scheme, demonstrating an entirely split party vote. However, all six of the Conservative panel members backed the Conservative Cabinet’s scheme. Quasi-judicial committees such as planning should not operate a party whip system. It is entirely possible that the Conservative members, all being men of similar ages and backgrounds, chose by chance to vote in the same manner. I trust that this will be investigated by the standards board in course. However, the Liberal Democrats do not operate a party whip system on planning, or indeed any other meeting. At council meetings, we tend to vote together because we agree with each other!

The Newbridge Park and Ride and associated bus road application was not determined by the planning committee. Instead, the committee deferred the application as it felt that not enough evidence had been provided to support the scheme. Certainly, I felt the the transport justification was insubstantial, and voted to wait until more information was provided.

A government minister has now suspended the planning application while he decides whether to let the council decide it, or whether he will send it to a government inspector to decide. If it does come back to BathNES, it will come before my committee again, so at this point -to avoid impropriety – I should stop typing.

Five PCNs

Parking on double yellow lines

At last week’s cabinet meeting, Bathwick Councillor Armand Edwards asked how many parking tickets had been issued outside Tesco. The answer? In the 6 months since the shop opened, only five tickets have been issued.

Given that I once saw seven simultaneous infringements, less than one parking ticket per month is embarrassingly low. The loading bay in-front of the shop is not for parking, it has double yellow lines. Likewise, parking is banned from either side of the bridge as the road narrows, turns a corner and crests the bridge.

As ever, I am harrying various organisations on behalf of Bathwck residents; the council, who have promised a new sign, the police who need to act against pavement parking and Tesco, which needs to manage its suppliers better.

New bus service launched

After First’s decision to axe the number 20 route, a new operator is to start up in town. However, Wessex Connect will not just run the 20A/C, but also intends to compete on the 18 route.

Maps and prices are at http://uni-connect.co.uk/default.aspx, showing the new U18 service running up and down Bathwick Hill, but crossing the river at North Parade. There are stops in the city centre and then in Oldfield Park. The 20 will also be kept in its current route, both anti- (A) and clockwise (C) around the city. Bigger buses will be used than present, but ticket prices will rise slightly. In contrast, the U18 will be a little cheaper than the existing 18 operated by First.

 I think that this is excellent news and I look forward to trying out the new operator. Armand and I, with the University and Students’ Union, have long been campaigning for better and cheaper bus services and I hope that competition will bring it.

The 20A/C will transfer, and the U18 will commence, from the 11th May. Tickets are available on the bus.

not again…

Grafitti on the Pulteney Road rail bridge The bollard on George Street has been hit again

Disappointingly I’ve been revisiting some old issues this week, fixed once, which need fixing again.

The railway bridge over Pulteney Road has been tagged again, this time with “MY TEAM”. This doesn’t make much more sense than the previous tag, “THICK”, but could take as long to clean off. See previous entries  here and here; it took the best part of a year to have the bridge re-painted last time. Again, Network Rail have confirmed to me that Pulteney Road will have to be closed for the tag to be painted out. A correspondant suggests “use the bridge space for a more useful and innovative purpose”. Does anyone else have any suggestions? A mural or a display board? As my photo shows, no matter how hard you try, anything looks nice on a sunny Spring day in Bath.

Also this week, the bollard on George Street (Bathwick Hill) at the junction with Darlington Street has come unstuck. I suspect that it will be repaired again, but I know a few people pushing for its removal.

First to slash bus services

First Bus intend to scrap the 20A/C bus and reduce services on nearly all other Bath routes from May.

The 20, which has a circular route around the city, has long been the worst of all First’s services, operating small, old mini-buses at infrequent and unpredictable intervals. Despite this, the peak time buses are packed, providing the only service between Combe Down, Ralph Allen School and the University.

University and school students living in Combe Down will be furious at the withdrawal of the service, which is their only realisitic public transport route. Many University students currently live in Combe Down, and many more will have signed house contracts for the next academic year intending to use the 20 bus. With the service due to stop the week before the university exams, these students will be left stranded.

MP Don Foster and Lib Dem councillors across Bath say that the changes are unacceptable. Don has already booked a meeting with the regional director of First Bus and Bathwick Councillor Nicholas Coombes has been co-ordinating with the University and BathNES council. A protest website has been launched at http://ourcampaign.org.uk/onthebuses

Cllr Coombes was interviewed on BBC radio Bristol to explain how the loss of the service would affect University students, but it also serves Moorland Road, Twerton, Weston and the Royal United Hospital. Nearly all other bus services in Bath have had their frequencies reduced or early morning services cut. Across the South West, First have cut or reduced routes to protect their profits during the recession.

Potholes

Potholes

The snow was very enjoyable, but it did terrible things to our roads and pavements. Now, when the pavements have finally defrosted, we can see the damage to the road surface.

Snow, then water, gets into cracks in the road surface and freezes. In freezing, it expands, forcing the crack apart. Thus Bathwick Hill has ten new deep potholes all the way from Copseland to the canal. I spent yesterday afternoon on my bike photographing them and now I’ve sent a report to BathNES highways department.

Fewer number fours

Gail Coleshill and Nicholas Coombes

First have altered some of their bus timetables to “improve punctuality and reliability”. Unfortunately for us, this means they have cut the service; fewer buses = better chance of making them run on time.

The number 4 service which previously went from Bathampton to Whiteway has been split. The 4 will now go along the Warminster Road from Bathampton to town and now the 12 will go up to Whiteway. However, while Whiteway retains its half hourly service, the number 4 slides to a 40 minute return journey. Obviously I am disappointed with this reduction in service and hope that it genuinely does improve reliability. Leader of the Lib Dem councillors, Paul Crossley has written to First on our behalf.

The new timetable is operative from 1st February and is here. The number 18 and almost every other Bath service is unchanged.

Action on King Edwards traffic

Traffic at King Edwards

King Edwards School last night re-launched their travel plan. A working group was formed to update their Travel Plan and pursue the recommendations.

While there may have been slow progress in the past, the school has worked hard to get all ‘stake-holders’ represented for the new plan. School pupils, parents, teachers and neighbours were invited and represented at last night’s meeting, plus BathNES staff and local councillor Nicholas Coombes.

“I am encouraged that the school has chosen to work with local residents on this.” said Cllr Coombes, “Travel arrangements are a matter of good neighbourliness and also of environmental concern. I am happy to join the working group to follow this through.”

Home to school tansport is a matter of concern accross the whole of BathNES (see http://nicholascoombes.mycouncillor.org.uk/2008/01/29/school-buses/) and has been the matter of a review launched by the Liberal Democrats. Bath’s Lib Dem councillors believe that money spent on the Bath Rapid Transit bus road would be better improving and reducing the cost of transport for young people to reduce school time traffic.